Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40821783›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

Mechanically induced development and maturation of 3D

Mamta Kumari, Kamare Alam, Anamitra Bhattacharya, Nakka Sharmila Roy, Vaishnavi Madhasu, Bitan Guchhait, Sangita Dan, Soma Sett, Jayanta Chakrabarti, Chandan Mandal and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mamta KumariDepartment of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Kamare AlamDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Anamitra BhattacharyaDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Nakka Sharmila RoyDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Vaishnavi MadhasuDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Bitan GuchhaitDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Sangita DanMolecular Pathology, Department of Laboratory of Medicine, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, India.
Soma SettMolecular Pathology, Department of Laboratory of Medicine, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, India.
Jayanta ChakrabartiSurgical Oncology, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, India.
Chandan MandalMolecular Pathology, Department of Laboratory of Medicine, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, India.
Velayutham RavichandiranDepartment of Natural Products, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Subhadeep RoyDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer comprises diverse histological and molecular subtypes, each characterized by distinct biological behaviors and therapeutic responses. So, to unravel the biological complexity of cancer tissue, we must research it down to the heterogeneous cell level, where one can investigate and deconstruct the molecular and biochemical characteristics of various cell types (Fibroblast, Endothelial Cells, and Cancer Stem cells). Unfortunately, advancements have been hindered due to the absence of thorough methods for identifying, isolating, and cultivating all patient-derived organoids (PDOs) types from various tissues. Personalized therapy in the form of PDOs represents a promising approach to advance therapeutic outcomes. This study aims to replicate the cellular and molecular heterogeneity of breast cancer by examining multiple cell types within PDOs and their contributions to tumor progression and metastasis. Methods: We developed and characterized 3D in vitro PDO models from breast cancer tissues, encompassing various subtypes including ER+, PR+, and HER2+ tumors. We have sought to comprehend the fundamental nature of the various breast cancer cell types uncover the biology underlying their inherent characteristics, the outcomes of their interactions, and the contributions they provide to the metastatic potential. The IHC finding showed the positive expression for B cells (CD20), luminal epithelial cells (CD24), leukocytes infiltrating cells (CD45), mesenchymal stem cells (CD73, CD90, 105), vascular endothelial cells (CD34, CD105), EMT (E-cadherin), and fibroblast (Fibronectin, collagen, laminin) markers. In addition, we provide a new IHC/IF antibody panel and a stringent identification that can address significant breast cancer cells. Oxidative stress biomarkers and secretome analysis patterns were analyzed to identify the release pattern of variable pro-inflammatory growth cytokines produced by the endothelial and cancer stem cells. Results: The IHC finding showed the positive expression for B cells (CD20), luminal epithelial cells (CD24), leukocytes infiltrating cells (CD45), mesenchymal stem cells (CD73, CD90, 105), vascular endothelial cells (CD34, CD105), EMT (E-cadherin), and fibroblast (Fibronectin, collagen, laminin) markers. In addition, we provide a new IHC/IF antibody panel and a stringent identification that can address significant breast cancer cells. Oxidative stress biomarkers and secretome analysis patterns were analyzed to identify the release pattern of variable pro-inflammatory growth cytokines produced by the endothelial and cancer stem cells. Discussion: The findings revealed the diverse fibroblast heterogeneity and variable epithelial to molecular profiles consistent with the original breast tumor. These 3D

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsOrganoidsCell Culture Techniques, Three DimensionalErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansNeoplastic Stem CellsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone3D microphysiological modelbreast cancerextracellular matrixpatient-derived organoidpersonalized medicinetumor heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID40821783
PMCPMC12350514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.