Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40821778›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

HER2-positive breast cancer with invasive micropapillary carcinoma component shows immunosuppressive microenvironment and resistance to neoadjuvant therapy.

Lulu Zhang, Lijia Zhou, Anli Yang, Shaoquan Zheng, Keming Chen, Yutian Zou, Qingru Zhou, Daining Wang, Fei Xu, Jiajia Huang and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Lulu Zhang *Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Lijia Zhou *Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Anli Yang *Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Shaoquan ZhengDepartment of Breast Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Keming ChenDepartment of Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yutian ZouDepartment of Breast Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Qingru ZhouDepartment of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Daining WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Fei XuDepartment of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Jiajia HuangDepartment of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Zhongyu YuanDepartment of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Shusen WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yanxia ShiDepartment of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Peng SunDepartment of Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Xin AnDepartment of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) is a rare histopathological subtype of breast cancer (BC) that shows a high incidence of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive expression. However, the therapeutic efficacy of current standard anti-HER2 therapies for this distinct BC subtype remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with HER2-positive BC who underwent neoadjuvant therapy with trastuzumab (H) or trastuzumab plus pertuzumab (HP) between 2015 and 2023 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. On the basis of the presence of an IMPC component in pretreatment tumor samples, patients were stratified into IMPC and non-IMPC groups. Baseline clinical and pathological characteristics, pathological complete response (pCR) rates, and survival outcomes were compared between two groups. Additionally, gene expression profiles and immune cells infiltration were assessed using GSE66418 dataset obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus and ImmuCellAI databases. To validate bioinformatics findings, matched pretreatment tumor samples from both groups were analyzed. Results: Among the 244 patients included in the study, 38 had an IMPC component (IMPC group), whereas 206 did not (non-IMPC group). The IMPC group exhibited significantly lower pCR rates compared to the non-IMPC group: 21.6% vs. 47.1% ( Conclusion: HER2-positive BC with IMPC demonstrates intrinsic resistance to anti-HER2 neoadjuvant therapy and harbors an immunosuppressive TME. These findings highlight the need for alternative treatment strategies and warrant prospective validation.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, PapillaryDrug Resistance, NeoplasmErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesTumor MicroenvironmentAdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyRetrospective StudiesTrastuzumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasespertuzumabTrastuzumabCTNNB1HER-2 positive invasive micropapillary carcinomaimmunosuppressive tumor microenvironmentresistance to neoadjuvant therapyβ-catenin

Identifiers

PMID40821778
PMCPMC12354535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.