ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Exploring the influence of probiotic administration routes on immune responses in atopic march.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nanobiotic-Enhanced Probiotics for Targeted Gut Delivery: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Applications, and Translational Challenges.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Children with atopic dermatitis (AD) have a higher likelihood of developing asthma, the so-called atopic march. Previous studies have suggested that probiotics can modulate development of the immune system and atopic disorders. However, the exact mechanisms and whether the route of administration of probiotics has a clinical effect are unknown. Therefore, we conducted this study to investigate whether different routes of administration of probiotics may have different effects. Method: Probiotics Bacteroides plebeius, B. ovatus, 74-B and YCFA-33 were administered to mice via oral and nasal routes for 4 weeks, followed by the induction of AD using ovalbumin (OVA). The condition of the stimulated skin and histology of skin tissues were evaluated. In addition, 3 days of consecutive exposure to OVA (3%) aerosol was used to induce asthma at the end of the AD experiment. Serum immunoglobulin E (IgE), IgG, IL-4, IFN-γ, and TNF-α levels and histological evaluations of lung tissues were assessed after the experiments. Result: The oral administration of probiotics B. plebeius and B. ovatus may have improved the inflammatory response of OVA-induced asthma. The nasal administration of the probiotics 74-B and YCFA-33 may have alleviated the symptoms of skin redness and itching of OVA-induced atopic dermatitis. These effects may have been due to reduced infiltration of white blood cells in the stimulated skin area and dampened inflammatory responses. In the later asthma model, YCFA-33 administration significantly increased total IgG and IgG1 in serum, reduced OVA-IgE levels and IL-4 levels, decreased neutrophil content and TNF-α expression, and increased IFN-γ levels in lung lavage fluid (p<0.05). These effects may have blocked the progression from AD to asthma pulmonary inflammation. Conclusion: B. ovatus had better effects via oral administration while 74-B and YCFA-33 had better effects via nasal administration. Oral administration is not always the best route. Probiotics may mitigate allergic reactions and pulmonary inflammation. These findings could contribute to the development of innovative biomarkers and early interventions for managing asthma and atopic disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.