ArticleDepression and anxiety2025
A Machine Learning-Based Case-Control Study on Suicide Risk Identification: Integrating Acoustic and Linguistic Features Under Stress Conditions.
Article in Depression and anxiety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Smartphone-Based Acoustic Machine Learning Pipeline for Detecting Suicidal Ideation: Case-Control Model Development and Validation Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Suicide is a significant global public health issue, with current risk assessment methods primarily relying on psychiatrists' clinical judgment and scale-based evaluations, which can be challenging to implement. Recently, interest has increased in using vocal and linguistic features to identify suicide risk. This study investigates speech-based methods for assessing suicide risk in two phases involving 90 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar disorder (BD). In Phase 1, three types of question-answer materials with different emotional valences (positive, neutral, and negative) were employed. The model combining acoustic and word frequency features from negative emotional valence materials achieved the highest accuracy at 77.82%. Phase 2 introduced stress factors, highlighting that speech data collected under stress better reflects participants' psychological states, providing more insights into suicide risk. These findings emphasize the potential of speech analysis in suicide prevention, while also calling for further research to validate and expand these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.