Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40821754›Full record

ReviewDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2025

Comparative Safety of GLP-1/GIP Co-Agonists Versus GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Weight Loss in Patients with Obesity or Overweight: A Systematic Review.

Zeyu Xie, Zhuoru Liang, Yilin Xie, Guimei Zheng, Weiling Cao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. How does type 2 diabetes modify the risk of Alzheimer's disease?Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zeyu XieDepartment of Pharmacy, The Third Affiliated Hospital (The Affiliated Luohu Hospital) of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518001, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-1609-4377
Zhuoru LiangDepartment of Pharmacy, The Third Affiliated Hospital (The Affiliated Luohu Hospital) of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518001, People's Republic of China.
Yilin XieDepartment of Pharmacy, The Third Affiliated Hospital (The Affiliated Luohu Hospital) of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518001, People's Republic of China.
Guimei ZhengDepartment of Pharmacy, The Third Affiliated Hospital (The Affiliated Luohu Hospital) of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518001, People's Republic of China.
Weiling CaoDepartment of Pharmacy, The Third Affiliated Hospital (The Affiliated Luohu Hospital) of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518001, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Tirzepatide, a dual GLP-1/GIP agonist, shows promise for weight loss, but its safety compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists requires (liraglutide, semaglutide) clarification for clinical decision-making. This systematic review evaluates their safety profiles in patients with obesity or overweight. Methods: We conducted a PRISMA-compliant systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42024576314) of RCTs from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane (inception to August 20, 2024). Adults with BMI ≥27 kg/m² (≥25 kg/m² for Asians) receiving GLP-1/GIP dual agonists (tirzepatide 10 or 15 mg) and GLP-1 receptor agonists (semaglutide 2.4 mg and liraglutide 3.0 mg) were included. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted by using odds ratios with 95% CIs. Primary outcomes were adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs. NMA was performed using Stata 16.1. Results: This network meta-analysis included 19 randomized controlled trials (13,529 participants). Liraglutide 3.0 mg significantly increased the incidence of any adverse events (OR = 1.53-2.00) compared to semaglutide and tirzepatide, while tirzepatide showed a higher severe hypoglycemia risk (<54 mg/dL). Notably, GLP-1/GIP dual agonists demonstrated superior safety profiles in neoplasms (vs liraglutide: OR = 5.15 [1.28-20.74]; vs semaglutide: OR = 3.55 [1.10-11.54]) and respiratory infections/nasopharyngitis, suggesting enhanced anti-inflammatory effects. GLP-1 agonists had fewer diarrhea and injection-site reactions but higher abdominal pain/dyspepsia rates. Subgroup analyses further revealed that non-T2DM patients had a significantly higher incidence of adverse events compared to T2DM patients (P < 0.05), while no significant associations were observed with race, BMI, or treatment duration. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness and funnel plots indicated no publication bias. Conclusion: Liraglutide 3.0 mg was associated with higher overall adverse events, while tirzepatide (10 or 15 mg) showed increased severe hypoglycemia and injection-site reactions risk but superior anti-inflammatory and anti-neoplasm effects compared to GLP-1 mono-agonists. These findings highlight therapy-specific safety patterns critical for personalized treatment selection.

Indexed as

GLP-1/GIP dual receptor agonistsGLP-1 receptor agonistsafetysystematic reviewtirzepatideweight loss

Identifiers

PMID40821754
PMCPMC12357579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.