ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2025
Living with congenital heart disease: a qualitative study to explore psychosocial impacts in adulthood.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Traumatic Compression of a Percutaneous Valve-in-Valve Right Ventricle-to-Pulmonary Artery Conduit in a Young Athlete.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Identifying Vulnerability in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: A Mixed-Methods Examination of Psychosocial Experiences.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Bridging communication gaps to improve adult congenital heart disease care: patient perspectives from a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The survival prospects of adults with congenital heart disease have improved considerably due to improved surgical interventions, resulting in a growing population. This study aims to explore the experiences of adults with congenital heart disease, to identify support needs. Methods: Participants were recruited from the National Australian Congenital Heart Disease Registry using purposive sampling to ensure diversity in terms of gender, rurality and disease complexity. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with adults with congenital heart disease. The interviews were recorded digitally and transcribed verbatim. Framework Analysis was used to ensure rigour in identifying themes. Results: 43 interviews were completed (23 males and 20 females; age 20 to 54 years). Three main themes and seven subthemes were identified to explain varying experiences of living with congenital heart disease: I. Lifestyle factors; (i) physical activity, (ii) weight management. II. Practical issues; (iii) employment, (iv) financial stress, (v) education. III. Psychosocial impact; (vi) mental health and resilience, and (vii) social engagement. Participants across a range of disease complexities reported more impact on their lives when they felt inadequately supported by their healthcare providers to address these challenges, such as insufficient education on exercise leading to difficulty performing clinically recommended physical activity. Conclusions: The lived experiences of adults living with congenital heart disease highlight specific areas needing support, which could inform future improvements in their "whole of life" care. This could include referral to allied health professionals, education across lifestyle and practical domains, and appropriate peer support networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.