ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2025
A novel approach to determining pulmonary valve replacement timing in repaired tetralogy of Fallot patients.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Here we propose a novel approach to determine a patient-specific optimal time for pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) based on a mathematical technique known as optimal stopping theory. Methods: We outline, in a theoretical framework, how we would apply the proposed timing rule for PVR in patients with rTOF. We define each of the model input variables specific to PVR, and we describe how the model can be assessed for its suitability for use in clinical practice to guide timing of PVR in patients with rTOF. Results: In this manuscript we demonstrate, for the first time, an application of a timing rule derived from a mathematical technique known as optimal stopping theory to determine the optimal time to perform PVR in patients with rTOF. Using the technique, we derive two patient-specific-thresholds on clinical status based on patient specific risk factors. PVR is recommended if at the time of assessment, a patient's clinical status lies between the thresholds. Otherwise, they are either too well or too unwell to undergo PVR. Conclusions: Current clinical practice guidelines for timing of PVR in patients with rTOF remains flawed and has since been challenged. We believe the timing rule is a suitable approach to complement current medical guidelines on when to perform PVR in patients with rTOF on a patient-specific level. To determine its suitability for generalized application in clinical practice, we intent to validate it retrospectively using large clinical cohort(s) who have undergone PVR for rTOF.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.