ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2025
Percutaneous implantation of self-expanding pulmonary valves: results from real-life experience of the Venus-P valve Registry of the Italian Society of Pediatric Cardiology (SICPED).
Article in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Self-expandable valves may have a significant impact on the feasibility of transcatheter treatments of RVOT dysfunction. Venus P valve is the first autoexpadable Valve that received CE mark in 2022. Here, we are reporting on a multicenter data collection about patients undergoing Venus P valve implantation in Italy. Materials: Seven italian centers were included in the study. Data were collected from patients treated with a venus P valve between July 2022 and May 2024. Indication for percutaneous valve implantation were in accordance with published guidelines. Results: During the study period, a total of 65 patients were considered eligible to percutaneous implantation of a Venus P valve. Median age at procedure was 35 years (IQR 12-63 years) median weight 63 Kg (IQR 33-103 Kg). Indication for PPVI was severe regurgitation in all subjects but one where ventricular pressure was increased because of stenosis on a homograft conduit and pulmonary arteries which needed previous bilateral stenting. Venus P valve was implanted successfully in 61/65(94 %) patients. Four procedural complications occurred(6 %): 1 artero-venous fistula, 1 pulmonary bleeding, 1 hemothorax and a pulmonary oedema. During follow up (median 13 months,1-20months), all patients experienced a significant improvement of functional class. Neither deaths or re-intervention occurred. CT Scan showed hypoattenuating leaflet thickness (HALT) in 4 patients and one of them experienced endocarditis 12 months after the procedure. Conclusions: Our study shows that Venus P valve implantation is safe and results are stable during a short-to-medium term follow-up. Endocarditis and HALT are inducing some concern and larger studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.