ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
Tokenization and deep learning architectures in genomics: A comprehensive review.
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing protein tokenization: reduced amino acid alphabets for efficient and accurate protein language models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Is the molecular microenvironment of the latent HIV reservoir predictable using deep learning approaches?Journal of virology · 2026Review
- Ensemble Deep Learning Models on Raw DNA Sequences for Viral Genome Identification in Human Samples.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- BlendSplice: A Frequency-Blended Generative Framework forComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- The transformative impact of AI-enabled AlphaFold 3: evolution, current status, and future prospects in structural biology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- vir2vec: A Viral Genome-Wide Viral Embedding.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of modern DNA sequencing technologies has resulted in the rapid growth of genomic data. Alongside the collection of this data, there is an increasing need for the development of modern computational tools leveraging this data for tasks including but not limited to antimicrobial resistance and gene annotation. Current deep learning architectures and tokenization techniques have been explored for the extraction of meaningful underlying information contained within this sequencing data. We aim to survey current and foundational literature surrounding the area of deep learning architectures and tokenization techniques in the field of genomics. Our survey of the literature outlines that significant work remains in developing efficient tokenization techniques that can capture or model underlying motifs within DNA sequences. While deep learning models have become more efficient, many current tokenization methods either reduce scalability through naive sequence representation, incorrectly model motifs or are borrowed directly from NLP tasks for use with biological sequences. Current and future model architectures should seek to implement and support more advanced, and biologically relevant, tokenization techniques to more effectively model the underlying information in biological sequencing data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.