Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40821713›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025

gSELECT: A novel pre-analysis machine-learning library enabling early hypothesis testing and predictive gene selection in single-cell data.

Deniz Caliskan, Aylin Caliskan, Thomas Dandekar, Tim Breitenbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Deniz CaliskanDepartment of Bioinformatics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, Würzburg D-97074, Germany.
Aylin CaliskanDepartment of Bioinformatics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, Würzburg D-97074, Germany.
Thomas DandekarDepartment of Bioinformatics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, Würzburg D-97074, Germany.
Tim BreitenbachDepartment of Bioinformatics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, Würzburg D-97074, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying biologically meaningful gene sets and evaluating their ability to separate conditions based on gene expression is an important step in many transcriptomic analyses. While most workflows support data-driven feature selection, few allow direct evaluation of predefined gene sets in a classification context. This limits the ability to assess literature-derived panels or biologically motivated hypotheses prior to downstream analysis. For this, we developed gSELECT, a Python library for evaluating the classification performance of both automatically ranked and user-defined gene sets. It operates on .csv or .h5ad expression matrices with group labels and can be easily integrated into existing analysis pipelines. Gene selection can be based on mutual information ranking, random sampling, or custom input. This supports hypothesis-driven testing without data-derived selection bias and allows direct evaluation of known or candidate markers. Classification is performed using multilayer perceptrons with Monte Carlo cross-validation, either on the full dataset or with a user-defined train/test split. Exhaustive and greedy strategies are available to explore combinatorial effects among genes to identify minimal gene combinations with high predictive power. gSELECT is intended as a pre-analysis tool to evaluate dataset separability and to support early assessment of candidate genes before committing to resource-intensive downstream analyses.

Indexed as

Dimension reductionExplainable AIGene combinationsGenerative AIMachine learningPrioritise genesTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID40821713
PMCPMC12354962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.