ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
gSELECT: A novel pre-analysis machine-learning library enabling early hypothesis testing and predictive gene selection in single-cell data.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- DataXflowGen for GenAI-driven model generation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Mathematical strategies for predicting resistant subpopulations from scRNAseq data of a PANC-1 3D tissue model: Insight into gemcitabine resistance and TGFB1-induced invasion and EMT.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying biologically meaningful gene sets and evaluating their ability to separate conditions based on gene expression is an important step in many transcriptomic analyses. While most workflows support data-driven feature selection, few allow direct evaluation of predefined gene sets in a classification context. This limits the ability to assess literature-derived panels or biologically motivated hypotheses prior to downstream analysis. For this, we developed gSELECT, a Python library for evaluating the classification performance of both automatically ranked and user-defined gene sets. It operates on .csv or .h5ad expression matrices with group labels and can be easily integrated into existing analysis pipelines. Gene selection can be based on mutual information ranking, random sampling, or custom input. This supports hypothesis-driven testing without data-derived selection bias and allows direct evaluation of known or candidate markers. Classification is performed using multilayer perceptrons with Monte Carlo cross-validation, either on the full dataset or with a user-defined train/test split. Exhaustive and greedy strategies are available to explore combinatorial effects among genes to identify minimal gene combinations with high predictive power. gSELECT is intended as a pre-analysis tool to evaluate dataset separability and to support early assessment of candidate genes before committing to resource-intensive downstream analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.