Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40821712›Full record

ReviewToxicology reports2025

Mycotoxin contamination in Malawi: A systematic review of progress and trends in contamination, knowledge, attitude, and practices.

Chimwemwe Chilenga, William Kasapila, Kingsley Masamba, Brown Ndhlovu, Victor Munkhuwa, Gracian Chibwana, Kennedy Machira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxicology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chimwemwe ChilengaLilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (LUANAR), Bunda College Campus, Food Science and Technology, Box 219, Lilongwe, Malawi.
William KasapilaLilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (LUANAR), Bunda College Campus, Food Science and Technology, Box 219, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Kingsley MasambaLilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (LUANAR), Bunda College Campus, Food Science and Technology, Box 219, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Brown NdhlovuBrowns Consulting Company, P.O Box 374, Rumphi, Malawi.
Victor MunkhuwaLilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (LUANAR), Bunda College Campus, Food Science and Technology, Box 219, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Gracian ChibwanaLilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (LUANAR), Bunda College Campus, Food Science and Technology, Box 219, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Kennedy MachiraDepartment of Agricultural Economics, LUANAR, Africa Center of Excellence in Agriculture Policy Analysis (APA), P.O box 219, Lilongwe, Malawi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycotoxin contamination remains a persistent barrier to Malawi's food safety, public health, and agricultural development. This systematic review assessed 36 peer-reviewed and grey literature sources published between 2009 and 2025 to evaluate contamination prevalence, knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) among food value chain stakeholders, and the effectiveness of existing interventions. The review followed PRISMA guidelines and applied thematic analysis to identify trends and gaps. Findings show critically low awareness levels, with a national average of 24.5 %, and no measurable improvements in KAP indicators between 2012 and 2025, despite numerous interventions. Aflatoxins were the most studied, primarily in maize and groundnuts, which accounted for 75.5 % of analyzed samples, while other toxins and susceptible foods such as dried fish, mushrooms, and vegetables remain largely overlooked. Misconceptions about mold-related health risks persist, and socio-economic constraints often lead communities to consume or sell contaminated food. Recommended mitigation strategies, such as drying and hand sorting, are underused due to labor intensity and limited technical support. Conflicting findings on post-harvest practices, particularly drying methods, have further complicated efforts to standardize effective interventions. This review consolidates fragmented data and reorganizes it to expose persistent knowledge gaps, neglected commodities, and intervention blind spots. It highlights the importance of conducting research that is rooted in agroecology and tailored to specific contexts. Furthermore, it advocates for a coordinated, multi-sectoral approach that strengthens surveillance, ensures regulatory compliance, and promotes education among stakeholders.

Indexed as

AflatoxinContaminationFumonisinsKAPMalawiMycotoxins

Identifiers

PMID40821712
PMCPMC12355490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.