Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40821705›Full record

ArticleLiver cancer2025

Non-Invasive Kupffer-CEUS Enhances the Accuracy of Focal Liver Lesions Diagnosis in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis or Fibrosis: A Prospective Multicenter Study from China.

Yunlin Li, Xiao-Ling Yu, Xiang Jing, Hong Yang, Kaiyan Li, Wei Wu, ShiChun Lu, Hong Ding, Guangjian Liu, Wen Cheng and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Ultrasound technology's new application in the diagnosis and treatment of liver cancer].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Yunlin LiDepartment of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiao-Ling YuDepartment of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiang JingDepartment of Ultrasound, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Hong YangDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Kaiyan LiDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Wei WuDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
ShiChun LuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hong DingDepartment of Ultrasound, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Guangjian LiuDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Wen ChengDepartment of Ultrasonography, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Guangzhi HeDepartment of Ultrasound, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Kai LiDepartment of Ultrasound, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yan LuoDepartment of Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Liping LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Tianan JiangDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Guiming ZhouDepartment of Ultrasound, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Xiaoyan XieDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhigang SongDepartment of Pathology, The First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Fang-Yi LiuSenior Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Centre of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jie YuSenior Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Centre of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhi-Yu HanSenior Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Centre of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhi-Gang ChengSenior Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Centre of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shuilian TanSenior Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Centre of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Junqing XiSenior Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Centre of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xuejuan DongSenior Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Centre of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Erpeng QiDepartment of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jundong YaoDepartment of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaocong DongDepartment of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ping LiangSenior Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Centre of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: It is challenging to diagnose liver masses in the context of a rough liver background using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Perfluorobutane CEUS microbubble, an ultrasound (US) contrast agent, has a unique phase called the Kupffer phase. This study aimed to explore whether the diagnostic ability of Kupffer-CEUS is affected by the rough liver background. Methods: A prospective analysis was conducted on patients with access to histological pathology of FLLs and liver parenchyma from 23 centers between August 2020 and March 2021. Kupffer-CEUS was performed on 552 patients, who were divided into two groups (normal and abnormal) based on the pathological results of liver parenchyma, and the abnormal group was further divided into four groups (sight liver fibrosis, serious liver fibrosis, fatty liver, mixed). Kupffer-CEUS was divided into vascular phase and vascular and Kupffer phase. Results: In Kupffer-CEUS, differences in diagnostic efficiency of FLLs between normal and abnormal liver backgrounds were not statistically significant. However, in patients with abnormal liver backgrounds, the specificity (57.45% vs. 74.47%, Conclusion: This study indicated that although there is no obvious restriction on the choice of Kupffer-CEUS methods when diagnosing liver masses in patients with normal or abnormal liver backgrounds, Kupffer phase CEUS can effectively reduce the misdiagnosis of FLLs. Particularly for patients with serious liver fibrosis, contrast-enhanced US combined with the Kupffer phase can provide a more accurate diagnosis than conventional contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Indexed as

CEUSCoarse liver parenchymaDiagnosisKupffer phaseLiver tumorVascular phase

Identifiers

PMID40821705
PMCPMC12355000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.