ArticleCancer management and research2025
Prognostic Significance of R-Loops in Lung Adenocarcinoma: Implications for Immune Response and Drug Sensitivity.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- R-loops and D-loops: a delicate balance in genomic stability and instability.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: R-loops, RNA-DNA hybrid structures, play essential roles in maintaining genomic stability and regulating transcription. This study aims to identify key R-loop regulatory genes as prognostic markers for LUAD and explore their associations with immunotherapy response and drug sensitivity, supporting personalized treatment strategies. Methods: We integrated 1771 R-loops genes with differentially expressed genes in LUAD. Through univariate Cox, LASSO, and multivariate Cox analyses, we constructed an R-loops prognostic risk score (R-loops Score) and validated it in three independent GEO cohorts. Correlations with clinical variables, immune features, and drug response were examined. Key genes were further evaluated by qPCR and Western blot in LUAD cell lines and tumor tissues. Results: Patients with high R-loops Scores had significantly poorer overall survival compared with low-score patients. A nomogram combining the R-loops Score and clinical factors achieved AUCs of 0.732, 0.713, and 0.719 for predicting 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS, respectively. Pathway enrichment indicated that high-score tumors were enriched in cell cycle regulation, phase separation, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. High R-loops Scores were associated with male sex, advanced stages, immune evasion and immunotherapy resistance, but increased chemotherapy and targeted therapy sensitivity. EIF3B was further validated as a key gene through analysis of a local patient cohort. Conclusion: The R-loops Score represents a promising prognostic tool for LUAD, offering valuable insights into survival outcomes, immune characteristics and drug responsiveness. Notably, qPCR and Western blot validation consistently confirmed EIF3B as a key gene, further supporting their potential as biomarkers. These results support future research and serve as a reference for the personalized precision treatment of LUAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.