ArticleMedComm2025
Using Machine Learning to Identify the Dynamic Evolution Patterns of Negative Emotions in Perinatal Women: A Longitudinal Study in Southwest China.
Article in MedComm, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paying attention to the mental health of perinatal women is helpful in improving their quality of life. However, the existing research pays less attention to the heterogeneity of its negative emotional trajectory and the identification of high-risk groups. This study recruited 860 perinatal women from four large hospitals in Chongqing from March 2018 to January 2019. They were followed up by structured questionnaires in the first trimester, second trimester, third trimester, and about 6 weeks after delivery. The growth mixture model was used to analyze the developmental trajectory of negative emotions, and six machine learning algorithms were used to establish a high-risk negative emotion recognition model. The performance of the model was comprehensively evaluated by five performance indicators. The SHAP algorithm was used to explain the model. Negative emotional trajectories were divided into four categories: low-stable anxiety group, gradually increasing high-anxiety group, mild sustained depression group, and high-progressive depression group. The extreme gradient boosting model performed best, with the highest prediction performance score (24 points). In summary, the negative emotional trajectory of perinatal women is dynamic and heterogeneous, and the prediction model based on machine learning may play an important role in identifying high-risk negative emotions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.