Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40821680›Full record

ArticleJournal of analytical methods in chemistry2025

Analysis of Differences in Volatile Components of Five Lauraceae Plants From Different Genera Based on HS-SPME-GC-MS.

Zhengjiu Wang, Hao Liu, Anping Liu, Peng Liu, Jiuyang Zhao, Shaoli Fan, Jinhui Wang, Bahetiyar Keremu, Lu Yang, Le Li

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of analytical methods in chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhengjiu WangKey Laboratory of Xinjiang Phytomedicine Resource and Utilization, Shihezi University, School of Pharmacy, Ministry of Education, Shihezi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1186-492X
Hao LiuXinjiang Association for Science and Technology, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Anping LiuKey Laboratory of Forest Resources and Utilization in Xinjiang of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Xinjiang Academy of Forestry, Urumqi, China.
Peng LiuKey Laboratory of Forest Resources and Utilization in Xinjiang of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Xinjiang Academy of Forestry, Urumqi, China.
Jiuyang ZhaoKey Laboratory of Forest Resources and Utilization in Xinjiang of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Xinjiang Academy of Forestry, Urumqi, China.
Shaoli FanKey Laboratory of Forest Resources and Utilization in Xinjiang of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Xinjiang Academy of Forestry, Urumqi, China.
Jinhui WangKey Laboratory of Xinjiang Phytomedicine Resource and Utilization, Shihezi University, School of Pharmacy, Ministry of Education, Shihezi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2069-1991
Bahetiyar KeremuKey Laboratory of Forest Resources and Utilization in Xinjiang of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Xinjiang Academy of Forestry, Urumqi, China.
Lu YangKey Laboratory of Forest Resources and Utilization in Xinjiang of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Xinjiang Academy of Forestry, Urumqi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1012-6494
Le LiKey Laboratory of Xinjiang Phytomedicine Resource and Utilization, Shihezi University, School of Pharmacy, Ministry of Education, Shihezi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1691-0036

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lauraceae plants are diverse in species and rich in volatile components, which possess functions such as insect repellency, antioxidant activity, and antibacterial properties. However, currently, the methods for analyzing the volatile components of Lauraceae plants are relatively single. The essential oils are mainly extracted by steam distillation, but the pretreatment is relatively complex and cumbersome. Therefore, it is essential to find a simple and cost-effective method. By comparing different extraction methods, HS-SPME-GC-MS was selected as the optimal extraction condition. Regarding Head-space Solid-Phase Microextraction and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS), single-factor condition optimization and response surface analysis were carried out for different fiber coatings, equilibrium time, extraction temperature, and extraction time. Eventually, 75-μm CAR/PDMS fiber head was chosen, with an equilibrium time of 15 min, and extraction was conducted at 70°C for 57 min as the optimal HS-SPME extraction conditions. Furthermore, a differential analysis of the volatile components of five Lauraceae plants from different genera was performed, and differential metabolites were screened out respectively. This can effectively separate

Indexed as

chemotaxonomyHS-SPME-GC-MSLauraceaeresponse surfacevolatile components

Identifiers

PMID40821680
PMCPMC12356664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.