ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Evaluating the potential of graphene oxide to promote skeletal muscle complex regeneration.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Graphene oxide-modified PEEK composites: Properties and applications in orthopaedic repair - A review.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Repair and regeneration of the musculoskeletal system are critical for maintaining mobility, physical function, and overall quality of life. This study aimed to optimize the size and concentration of graphene oxide (GO) to achieve a balance that enhances the proliferation and myogenic differentiation of C2C12 cells and investigate the underlying mechanisms, including the activation of key myogenic genes and signaling pathways. Additionally, the effects of exosomes derived from GO-treated C2C12 myoblasts on osteoblasts were explored. Methods: C2C12 cells were cultured with different concentrations (0.1, 0.5, 2.5, 12.5, and 62.5 μg/mL) and particle sizes (>500 and <500 nm) of GO. Thereafter, cell viability, proliferation, cycle, and migration were evaluated via fluorescence staining, CCK-8, flow cytometry, and scratch assays, respectively. Immunofluorescence, polymerase chain reaction, and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) were used to detect the effects of GO on C2C12 cell differentiation and explore the related molecular mechanisms. Furthermore, RNA-seq analysis was performed to investigate the impact of exosomes derived from GO-treated C2C12 myoblasts on MC3T3-E1 cells. Results: GO with particle sizes of >500 nm at a concentration of 2.5 μg/mL significantly enhanced C2C12 cell proliferation and myogenic differentiation. Increased GO conductivity played a crucial role in supporting Conclusion: The conductive properties and surface roughness of GO significantly enhanced interactions between muscle and bone tissues, consequently facilitating effective musculoskeletal repair. This study suggests that GO can serve as a promising material for integrated approaches in musculoskeletal tissue engineering by promoting both myogenic differentiation and osteoblastic activity. Our findings highlight the potential utility of GO in regenerative medicine, offering a novel strategy for musculoskeletal regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.