ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Evaluation of a single-use bioartificial liver (BAL) biocartridge consisting of cryopreservable alginate encapsulated liver cell spheroids as a component of HepatiCan™, a novel bioartificial liver device.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: alternative therapies to complement liver transplantation and treat patients with liver failure are not available. In this study, a clinical scale single-use biocartridge was developed for use as part of a novel Bioartificial Liver device (HepatiCan™), utilising conditioned human-derived alginate encapsulated liver spheroids (AELS), within a fluidised bed. Methods: to develop the optimal biocartridge, two designs (B2 and B3) were created and modelled to best replicate the performance of our preexisting reusable cartridge (B1). The suitability of designs, and their ability to deliver the required hydrodynamic conditions for AELS, during both spheroid production and treatment phases, was addressed by computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Subsequently, the B3 biocartridge was produced and tested under continuous fluidisation conditions for the growth after encapsulation and recovery after cryopreservation of micro-spheroids in hydrogel scaffolds (AELS). Results: the main difference between the designs in (B2 and B3) was the base plate flow distributor. Preserving the hole pattern in the base plate, between B1 and B3, was critical for mimicking fluid flow. Additionally, increasing the number of orifices in the cross-patterned base plate design (B3) provided further benefits: maintaining homogeneity in fluid velocity distribution, whilst avoiding "dead-flow" zones. During AELS culture (using B3 format), a cell density of 24.27 ± 3.0 × 106 cells/mL of beads was achieved by day 11. Additionally, post-thaw recovery (PTR) culture of previously cryopreserved clinical doses of AELS was performed for up to 4 days. Return to the pre-freeze total biomass (6.34 ± 0.9 × 1010 cells of AELS) was achieved after 3 days of PTR; AELS growth continued to a total biomass of 8.48 ± 1.6 × 1010 cells by 4 days. Discussion: the final biocartridge design (B3) was as effective in fluid distribution as the original (B1). B3 surpassed B1 in velocity uniformity over the first 10 mm above the base plate, critical for good mass transfer between biomass and perfusing fluid in the fluidised bed. Sustained biological function for AELS after PTR was demonstrated. One remarkable advantage of this biocartridge is the recovery of functional AELS biomass after cryopreservation. Thus, we facilitate the off-the-shelf availability, whilst preserving essential biological functionality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.