Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40821620›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in chronic disease2025

Investigating the therapeutic efficacy of microcurrent therapy: a narrative review.

Sarahrose Jonik, Andrew J Rothka, Neyha Cherin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in chronic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarahrose JonikPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Andrew J RothkaPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5616-7260
Neyha CherinDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0103-9439

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microcurrent (MIC) therapy is a non-invasive, low-intensive electrical modality that remains underutilized despite evidence supporting its therapeutic potential. With applications in chronic pain, wound healing, musculoskeletal injuries, deconditioning, and neuropsychological conditions, MIC offers a pain-free alternative to traditional electrotherapies. This narrative review compiles the current literature on MIC therapy, highlighting its physiological mechanisms, such as promoting cellular repair, modulating inflammation, and reducing pain, without inducing discomfort or muscle fatigue. Though more high-quality evidence is needed, this review examines the current evidence on MIC's role in managing chronic and complex conditions across diverse healthcare environments and patient populations.

Indexed as

chronic painmicrocurrentrehabilitationwound healing

Identifiers

PMID40821620
PMCPMC12357078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.