ArticleStatistics in biosciences2025
Bias and Efficiency Comparison between Multiple Imputation and Available-Case Analysis for Missing Data in Longitudinal Models.
Article in Statistics in biosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, we compare the performance of available-case analysis (ACA) and several multiple imputation (MI) approaches for handling missing data problems in longitudinal analysis through estimation bias and relative efficiency. When the missingness of covariates depends on observed responses, ACA produces estimation bias, but it is preferred when there are only missing values in longitudinal responses. Multilevel MI methods are not always a solution to longitudinal data analysis. Single-level MI methods, like fully conditional specification (FCS), provide unbiased estimates under a variety of missing data scenarios, and improve efficiency gain in certain scenarios. The general assumption of missing data mechanism is missing at random (MAR). We carry out a systematic synthetic data analysis where missing data exist in longitudinal outcomes or/and covariates under different kinds of missing data generation procedures. The analysis model is a linear mixed-effects model. For each of the missing data scenarios, we give our recommendation (between ACA and a specific MI method) based on theoretical justifications and extensive simulations. In addition, a longitudinal neurodegenerative disease dataset is used as a real case study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.