ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2025
Reirradiation of recurrent glioblastoma: Results from a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A multicenter analysis of prognostic factors for patients undergoing re-irradiation for recurrent glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The management of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) remains a clinical challenge, with only limited therapeutic options available to date. Reirradiation may offer a progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in selected cases, but data are scarce. Methods: Consecutive patients from the last 10 years with GBM (CNS WHO grade 4, IDH-wildtype) who underwent at least one additional course of cranial radiotherapy for suspected or histopathologically confirmed rGBM at a tertiary neuro-oncological center were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was PFS, secondary endpoints included reirradiation-related adverse event rates, with a particular focus on radiation necrosis (RN). Results: Fifty-nine patients were included with a median follow-up (range) of 8.7 (0.5-48.0) months after reirradiation. The median time to first recurrence was 15 (4-89) months, with the majority occurring in-field (59.7 %). The EQD2 Conclusion: In this retrospective analysis, reirradiation for rGBM was feasible and safe, conferring a potential PFS benefit in selected patients. Bevacizumab emerged as a particularly promising combination partner, contributing to both RN prevention and enhanced efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.