Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40821358›Full record

ArticleNeuroethics2025

Privacy in perspective: research participants' priorities and concerns related to sharing data generated in human neuroscience studies.

Christi J Guerrini, Jill O Robinson, Norah L Crossnohere, Mary A Majumder, Kathryn Maxson Jones, Whitney Bash Brooks, Sameer A Sheth, Amy L McGuire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Engaging patient communities in intracranial neuroscience research.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christi J GuerriniCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Jill O RobinsonCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Norah L CrossnohereDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Mary A MajumderCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Kathryn Maxson JonesCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Whitney Bash BrooksCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Sameer A ShethDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Amy L McGuireCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

BRAINShare: Sharing Data in BRAIN Initiative StudiesR01MH126937 · NIMH · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MCGUIRE, AMY L, SHETH, SAMEER ANIL · 2021 to 2024
$1.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH126937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The societal benefits from sharing and reusing data collected in human neuroscience studies are widely appreciated. However, there are persistent barriers to data sharing as well as privacy concerns related to unauthorized access, misuse, and reidentification of deidentified data. Thus far, few studies have been conducted with neuroscience research participants to understand their data sharing priorities and concerns. We conducted a survey utilizing an experimental design with N=52 participants in neuroscience studies funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health representing diverse neurotechnologies and health conditions. Respondents prioritized sharing practices that maximize reuse of data to benefit patients and reduce the possibility of misuse of shared data. Most believed that both advancing research as quickly as possible and protecting their privacy are important. However, when forced to choose between these objectives, two-thirds of respondents believed that advancing research is most important. Reflecting on specific secondary use scenarios, the largest proportion of respondents were concerned about the possibility their shared brain data might be used to discriminate against them. On balance, respondents were less concerned about sharing their health information, including their brain imaging results, than sharing their online, spending, and location histories. The results affirm that data sharing with secondary researchers with the goal of helping patients by advancing research should remain a top priority and provide empirical support for legislation to prevent harms from misuse of sensitive personal data.

Indexed as

best-worst scalingdata sharingdiscriminationprivacysecuritysurvey

Identifiers

PMID40821358
PMCPMC12356284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.