Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40821340›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

The Use of E-mail in Primary Care: Characterization of the Reality of a Family Health Unit.

Adriana Silva, Patricia B Nascimento, Amaro Henriques, Liliana Portela, Diogo B Almeida, Vasco Varela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adriana SilvaFamily Medicine, Unidade Local de Saúde Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, PRT.
Patricia B NascimentoFamily Medicine, Unidade Local de Saúde Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, PRT.
Amaro HenriquesFamily Medicine, Unidade Local de Saúde Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, PRT.
Liliana PortelaFamily Medicine, Unidade Local de Saúde Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, PRT.
Diogo B AlmeidaFamily Medicine, Unidade Local de Saúde Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, PRT.
Vasco VarelaFamily Medicine, Unidade Local de Saúde Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, PRT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction The progressive digitalization of healthcare has fostered the utilization of e-mail as a communication tool between users and family physicians. This modality has the potential to enhance accessibility, ensure continuity of care, and support clinical decision-making. Nevertheless, concerns persist regarding data security, equitable access, and increased workload for professionals. This study aims to characterize the use of e-mail communication within a Family Health Unit in Lisbon. Methods A descriptive, observational, cross-sectional, and retrospective study was conducted, based on the analysis of 1,282 e-mails sent by users to two family physicians between July and December 2021. Variables analyzed included user characteristics (sex, age, educational attainment), reasons for contact, response rate, and time, as well as the subsequent clinical or administrative outcomes resulting from the e-mail exchanges. Results Among the users, 71.68% were female, with a mean age of 48.2 years. Of the 390 users for whom educational data were available, 94.10% had attained higher education. The main reasons for contact were requests for prescriptions or test results (35.34%), administrative matters (14.66%), and repeat prescription requests (11.86%). Only 32.06% of the e-mails received a response, with a median response time of 2 days. Approximately 11% of the contacts led to in-person or telephone consultations, and 26.37% were documented in the clinical record. Conclusion The findings reflect an increased reliance on e-mail communication in primary care, accentuated by the digital transformation following the COVID-19 pandemic. The results underscore the necessity of establishing regulatory frameworks, providing professional training, and allocating adequate resources to ensure the safe, efficient, and equitable integration of this tool into routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

clinical governancee-mailhealthcare digitalizationprimary health caretelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID40821340
PMCPMC12351660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.