Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40821320›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Leveraging Contingency Management to Encourage Online Brain Training Among Economically Disadvantaged Seniors: A Pilot Study.

Jayla Hsiung, Lucy Nalepa, Qige Pan, Delya Chiu, Karan Patel, Jeffrey Chao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jayla HsiungPre-Med/Applied Math, Brown University, Providence, USA.
Lucy NalepaSenior Connection, Highland Park High School, Highland Park, USA.
Qige PanSenior Connection, Highland Park High School, Highland Park, USA.
Delya ChiuSenior Connection, Highland Park High School, Highland Park, USA.
Karan PatelNeurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA.
Jeffrey ChaoInternal Medicine, Kaiser Permanente, San Fransisco, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of using contingency management (CM) to encourage economically disadvantaged seniors to participate in an online brain training program. Of 100 residents at a Housing Authority apartment complex, 11 initially enrolled, incentivized by monetary rewards. Despite multiple follow-up events, only 2% continued to engage regularly in weekly exercises. Participation was limited by several barriers, including confusing flyer language, limited access to technology, and low digital literacy. Additionally, non-CM costs, such as providing technical resources and on-site support, were found to be four times higher than CM-related expenses. These findings suggest that while CM is a promising incentive, substantial additional investments are needed to sustain engagement. With a modest 2% sustained participation rate, the study highlights significant socioeconomic and technological challenges. However, if these barriers are addressed through integrated support systems and digital infrastructure investments, CM-based interventions could potentially reach and benefit hundreds of thousands of the estimated 6-8 million economically disadvantaged older adults nationwide. Overall, the findings underscore the need for comprehensive interventions that combine incentives, access to technology, and consistent technical support to promote cognitive health in underserved aging populations.

Indexed as

brain trainingcognitive healthcognitive trainingcontingency managementdigital literacyeconomically disadvantaged seniorselderly individualsfinancial incentivesenior wellnesstechnology access

Identifiers

PMID40821320
PMCPMC12351509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.