ArticleCureus2025
Consequences of Academic Failure in Medical School: The Student's Perspective.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Academic failure is a common and often constructive part of medical education. For many students, encountering setbacks can serve as valuable learning experiences that foster resilience, self-awareness, and professional growth. Medical students, often high achievers, typically struggle with a fear of failure. This is usually driven by misconceptions of the consequences and of remediation. This, in turn, results in psychological distress, anxiety, and burnout. Despite its inevitability, perceptions of academic failure remain poorly understood and under-discussed. This study aims to evaluate medical students' understanding of academic failure, perceived consequences, and suggestions for improving institutional transparency and support. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in October 2023 via convenience sampling, using a semi-structured questionnaire to assess the perceptions of United Kingdom-based clinical medical students on their perceptions of the consequences of academic failure and their recommendations for institutional change. Data were thematically analysed to identify a consensus, common patterns, noteworthy responses, and alignment with literature. Results A total of 30 students were included in the study, of whom 19 (63%) self-reported a good understanding of academic failure, while 11 (37%) indicated poor understanding, largely due to institutional ambiguity. Key academic concerns included deregistration (n=11, 37%) and exam retakes (n=7, 23%). Twenty-two (73%) students perceived little to no career impact. Personal consequences were more prominent, with 17 (57%) citing mental health decline and 16 (53%) noting loss of self-worth. Twenty (67%) students emphasized the need for procedural transparency regarding failure and remediation, with 11 (37%) calling for clearer information, and 15 (50%) suggesting cultural shifts away from perfectionism. Many recommended open discussions about failure (n=13, 43%) and tailored support for struggling students (n=11, 37%). Conclusion Medical students demonstrate varied understanding of academic failure, with personal consequences outweighing academic or professional concerns. Uncertainty about remediation procedures exacerbates fear and distress. Increased institutional transparency and efforts to reduce the stigma, without trivialising failure, and proactive, targeted support could modulate fear of failure and improve outcomes. Future research should broaden the student cohort and scope, for example, to include a wider range of medical students at multiple stages of education to further inform comprehensive support strategies in medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.