ArticleCureus2025
Use of a Social Media Platform for Undergraduate Medical Writing: Experience From a Developing Country.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction While scientific writing is an important skill undergraduates need to develop, many find it to be challenging in the early parts of their journey, as opportunities to improve and publish their academic writing are scarce. Although many scientific journals use social media platforms to increase their accessibility, their use in undergraduate writing is not documented. Methods The medical student journal "The Apprentice" and its Facebook platform were established in 2020 by a volunteer group of medical students representing all academic years. The Facebook journal publishes case reports, scientific papers, posts of medical interest, and posts containing matters of medical education and perspectives. Written work submitted to the journal is reviewed by the editorial board, which consists of a volunteer group of students. The final review is done by the volunteer staff advisors. Subsequently, work is published on the Facebook platform. The three-year progress of the journal was evaluated by looking at total likes, interactions, and reaches of the published posts. Results Over a period of three years, there were 3,344 followers and 3,269 likes. There were 202 posts, with a mean of 333 reaches per post and 44 mean engagements. Most of the journal page followers were in the age range of 25-34 years, which coincides with the majority of undergraduates in Sri Lankan medical schools. Additionally, they were geographically centered around the three main universities in the country. The highest reach and engagement were seen with the case reports (reach: 995) and original articles (reach: 1980) posted on the page. Conclusions This study demonstrates the ability to use a social media-based student journal to bridge the gap between informal learning and formal academic publishing, especially in a resource-poor setting. "The Apprentice" Facebook journal became popular among medical undergraduates in a short time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.