Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40821226›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Improving Compliance With the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) Guidelines for Early Weight Bearing Following Ankle Fracture Fixation: A Closed-Loop Audit From a UK District General Hospital.

Ahmed Mohamed, Usman Fuad, Mohamed Zahed, Maimen Shyam, Alaa Elasad, Aqeel Aqeel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ahmed MohamedTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, GBR.
Usman FuadTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, GBR.
Mohamed ZahedOrthopaedics, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, GBR.
Maimen ShyamTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, GBR.
Alaa ElasadGeneral Practice, Zagazig University, Zagazig, EGY.
Aqeel AqeelGeneral Surgery, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Ankle fractures are common injuries, and in many cases, operative treatment is required. While the indications for surgical fixation are well established, the optimal timing for weight bearing after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) remains controversial. Some surgeons continue to favour a conservative approach involving delayed weight bearing, whereas others encourage early mobilisation. The recent guidelines recommend early weight bearing unless there is a documented concern regarding fixation stability or soft tissue condition. Adherence to these guidelines promotes patient satisfaction and reduces strain on healthcare services. This closed-loop audit aimed to compare our department's practice at Royal Cornwall Hospital against the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) standard for postoperative mobilisation after ankle fracture fixation. Methods This closed-loop audit involved both retrospective and prospective analysis of postoperative weight-bearing status in patients undergoing ORIF for isolated, closed ankle fractures at a single UK centre. Two audit cycles were performed. The first cycle (November 2023 to May 2024) retrospectively analysed patients' postoperative instructions. Following an educational intervention, including departmental emails and posters, a second cycle was prospectively conducted between July and November 2024. Inclusion criteria included skeletally mature patients (>18 years old) who underwent surgical treatment for isolated, closed ankle fractures. Exclusion criteria included open fractures, associated injuries, conservative management, or treatment with hindfoot nails. Results In the first cycle, 112 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 56 patients (50%) were advised against early weight bearing, while 56 patients (50%) were advised to commence early weight bearing in a cast or boot. In the second cycle, 58 patients were assessed; 18 patients (31%) were advised against early weight bearing, and 40 patients (69%) were advised to commence early weight bearing, indicating significant improvement following intervention. Conclusion A targeted educational approach, including the distribution of BOAST guidelines and departmental discussions, led to improved compliance with early weight-bearing protocols. This audit highlights the value of team-based education and proactive audit cycles in enhancing adherence to national standards and improving service provision.

Indexed as

ankle fractureankle orifboast guidelinesearly weight bearingorthopaedic audit

Identifiers

PMID40821226
PMCPMC12356356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.