ReviewCureus2025
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Efficacy of Enteral Antibiotics Combined With Mechanical Bowel Preparation Versus Mechanical Bowel Preparation Alone in Elective Colorectal Resections.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compares the outcomes of elective colorectal surgery in patients who received enteral antibiotics (EAb) in addition to standard care (SC) (mechanical bowel preparation and intravenous antibiotics) to those who received SC alone. This study will review existing research on the impact of prophylactic EAb on colorectal surgery outcomes. Relevant studies were identified from electronic medical databases and analysed using the statistical software RevMan (Review Manager 5.4, The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark) based on the principles of meta-analysis. A total of 13 studies (nine RCTs and four comparative trials) on 9,466 patients for postoperative outcomes were included. A random-effects model analysis was conducted, revealing that anastomotic leak rates were higher in the control group, with no heterogeneity observed. Surgical site infections were higher in the control group with moderate heterogeneity. Postoperative mortality and readmission rates were similar in both groups. The use of EAb is associated with a reduced incidence of anastomotic leaks and surgical site infections; however, readmission rates and mortality require further assessment in a major, multicenter, randomised study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.