Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40821220›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

The Effect of Team Census on Outcomes in Trauma Patients.

Anthony J Duncan, David R Velez, Khaled Zreik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anthony J DuncanDepartment of Surgery, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Fargo, USA.
David R VelezDepartment of Surgery, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Fargo, USA.
Khaled ZreikDepartment of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Sanford Health, Fargo, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysician workload has steadily increased, with higher workloads linked to worse patient outcomes. However, the impact of workload on trauma care remains unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the impact of the census on trauma patients' outcomes.

methodsWe conducted a five-year retrospective analysis of all trauma patients admitted to our Level I trauma center. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between team census on the day of admission and patient outcomes, adjusting for Injury Severity Score (ISS).

resultsPatients admitted on high census days had significantly higher ISS. After adjusting for ISS, these patients demonstrated significantly higher rates of delirium but no significant differences in other complications. Notably, hospital length of stay was significantly shorter for patients admitted on high census days.

conclusionThe most severely injured trauma patients often present on the busiest days, potentially straining clinical resources. Higher delirium rates and shorter lengths of stay raise concerns about whether these patients receive optimal care or are being discharged prematurely. These findings underscore the critical need to preserve care quality during high-volume periods and to develop strategies that mitigate the impact of rising workloads on trauma patient outcomes.

Indexed as

acute deliriuminstitutional workloadpatient dischargetrauma centersworkload

Identifiers

PMID40821220
PMCPMC12357006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.