ReviewCureus2025
Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training in Preventing Urinary Incontinence After Vaginal Delivery: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of Exercise Therapy for Postpartum Urinary Incontinence-Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common issue among women after vaginal delivery and can have various impacts on daily life. Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is often used as a preventive intervention, although its effectiveness has shown mixed results in research. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of PFMT in preventing UI after vaginal delivery by synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, multiple databases were searched for relevant RCTs published before May 2025. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria and were assessed for risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool 2 (RoB 2). Due to methodological differences, data were narratively synthesized. Overall, PFMT showed benefits in reducing UI and improving quality of life, particularly when delivered with structured support. However, some studies reported no significant effects. Adherence emerged as an important factor influencing outcomes. Most studies had a low risk of bias, though feasibility trials showed higher risks. PFMT appears to be a promising approach for preventing postpartum UI, especially with supervised or technology-assisted protocols. Further research is needed to standardize interventions, ensure long-term follow-up, and evaluate implementation across various healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.