ReviewCureus2025
Understanding the Influence of Culture on End-of-Life, Palliative, and Hospice Care: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing health beliefs and patient delay among breast cancer patients in West Sumatra, Indonesia.MethodsX · 2026Article
- Factors Associated With Family Caregivers' Attitudes Toward Withholding Life-Sustaining Treatment in Older Adults With Dementia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Palliative Care Interventions for Patients With Kidney Disease: A Scoping Review by the Kidney Disease Aging Research Collaborative.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
- Perceived Importance of Good Death Components Among Patients With Advanced Cancer and Family Caregivers.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Sociocultural beliefs and palliative care needs among older adults in low- and middle-income countries: A narrative review.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2026Review
- The nurse's role during death and bereavement: a systematic review.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Caregiver guilt as an underrecognised burden in family cancer caregiving: a scoping review and implications for palliative care support.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Patterns of interaction between patients, family members, and health professionals as markers of identity in palliative care.Palliative & supportive care · 2026Article
- Elevating relevance of autoethnography in palliative care research.Palliative & supportive care · 2026Article
- Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Last Days of Life: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Digital Framing in End-of-Life Communication: Constructing "Good Death" Support in the Discourse of Hospice Care Institutions in the UK and Hong Kong.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Between culture and care: nurses' experiences of end-of-life communication in Ghana.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Associations between sociodemographic factors, experience of death and dying, and death literacy: A nationally representative cross-sectional study.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Case Report: Family-mediated prognostic non-disclosure and psychological deterioration in terminal cancer.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Legacy Building from the Perspective of Palliative Care Professionals in Portugal: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Factors influencing healthcare professionals' rating on quality of death and dying: a nationwide cross-sectional study in China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Anticipatory Grief Among Family Caregivers of Terminally Ill Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Study Among Bangladeshi Population.Palliative medicine reportsArticle
- Critique of the Peaceful End-of-Life Theory Using Meleis' 2012 Approach.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cultural beliefs and values significantly shape end-of-life care decisions, including palliative and hospice care approaches. These cultural influences affect how patients and families view death, pain management, and medical decision-making. This narrative review examines how cultural factors impact care delivery for patients with terminal diagnoses, with particular attention to improving patient-provider communication and trust across diverse populations. A search of the current literature was conducted from March 1, 2022, to May 1, 2022, through the following databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, Directory of Open Access Journals, JSTOR, PsycINFO, ERIC Database (via EBSCOhost), and Academic Search Complete. The following key terms were used with Boolean operations: culture, demographic, end-of-life care, hospice, palliative care, terminal illness, and truth disclosure. A combination of qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods, and review studies was included in the review. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to appraise quantitative and qualitative literature critically, and the Risk of Bias in Systematic Review was used to appraise reviews critically. This narrative review included 25 relevant publications related to influence of culture and patient demographics on end-of-life care, hospice, and palliative care. As each culture has its own unique views on death and dying, it is crucial to note these cultural differences when assisting with end-of-life care to best align with patients' beliefs and values. Themes such as cultural barriers, communication preferences and family roles emerged from the publications. The findings of this review highlight the critical role that cultural beliefs and values play in shaping end-of-life care experiences. However, gaps remain in the literature regarding how specific cultural nuances influence care decisions, communication preferences, and family dynamics. Future research should focus on exploring underrepresented ethnic and cultural groups to better understand their unique perspectives on death, dying, and medical decision-making. Additionally, there is a need to develop and evaluate culturally tailored interventions that promote patient-centered care, enhance provider-patient communication, and build trust in end-of-life care settings. Addressing these gaps will help ensure that care is respectful of and responsive to the diverse cultural contexts in which patients and families make these deeply personal decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.