Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40821132›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Evaluating Psychological Interventions for Pain, Recovery, and Outcomes in Surgical and Medical Care.

Ali Khalid, Ata Mohajer-Bastami, Ameer Khamise, Sjaak Pouwels, Sarah Moin, Vithusana Araamuthan, Aya Khalid, Ahmed Ahmed, Suhaib Ahmad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ali KhalidSchool of Medicine, The University of Buckingham Medical School, Buckingham, GBR.
Ata Mohajer-BastamiDepartment of Surgery, Ealing Hospital, London, GBR.
Ameer KhamiseStoke Mandeville Hospital, Buckinghamshire Health Trust, Aylesbury, GBR.
Sjaak PouwelsIntensive Care Medicine, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, NLD.
Sarah MoinDepartment of General Surgery, East Surrey Hospital, London, GBR.
Vithusana AraamuthanDepartment of Psychology, University of London, London, GBR.
Aya KhalidSchool of Medicine, Medipol University International School of Medicine, Istanbul, TUR.
Ahmed AhmedDepartment of General Surgery, Imperial College London, London, GBR.
Suhaib AhmadDepartment of General Surgery, Ysbyty Gwynedd Hospital, Bangor, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypnosis is a recognised technique in pain management and anaesthesia. Historically used by James Esdaile in the 19th century, it remains underutilised in modern clinical settings. This narrative review examines the historical context, mechanisms, and clinical applications of hypnosis, highlighting its effectiveness in general surgery, orthopaedics, urology, obstetrics, oncology, and paediatrics. Evidence shows that hypnosis can reduce perioperative pain, anxiety, and opioid use, while enhancing recovery. Neuroimaging studies reveal altered brain activity during hypnotic states, supporting its physiological basis. Despite these benefits, adoption remains limited due to misconceptions, lack of awareness, and insufficient training among healthcare providers. Cultural attitudes and the absence of standardised protocols also hinder its integration. Hypnosis has demonstrated particular value in chronic pain conditions such as fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, and cancer-related symptoms, offering a low-risk, cost-effective adjunct to care. This review calls for structured training to integrate hypnosis into routine, patient-centred clinical practice.

Indexed as

anesthesiahypnosisnon-pharmacological interventionspain managementsurgery

Identifiers

PMID40821132
PMCPMC12356478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.