ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025
Development and validation of a gradient boosting machine-based model for predicting tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte proportions in breast cancer.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo construct and validate a multidimensional model for evaluating tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels in breast cancer (BC) patients.
methodsThis retrospective study included 318 BC patients with 318 lesions confirmed by MRI and surgical pathology in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from January 2021 to December 2024. The patients were randomly split into a training set (n=228) and a validation (n=90) set, and further divided into low and high TIL groups based on immunophenotype assessment. Multivariate Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of TILs levels. A gradient boosting machine (GBM) model and a Logistic regression model were built. Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). An external validation cohort of 120 BC patients admitted between January 2025 and May 2025 was used to verify the predictive accuracy of the GBM model. Results Ki-67 level, internal enhancement pattern, multifocality, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were identified as independent predictors of high TIL levels. The GBM model demonstrated superior performance compared to the Logistic regression in the training set (AUC: 0.859 vs 0.724; P=0.014). Calibration curves indicated good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities in both models. DCA showed that the GBM model provided higher clinical utility. External validation yielded an AUC of 0.784 for the GBM model, with the calibration curve and DCA further confirming the model's good calibration and clinical applicability.
conclusionThe GBM-based multidimensional model reliably predicts TIL levels in BC patients, supporting prognosis evaluation and guiding personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.