ReviewMutagenesis2026
The micronucleus assay in exfoliated buccal cells for occupational exposure studies: an overview.
Review in Mutagenesis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review describes the use of the micronucleus (MN) assay with exfoliated cells from the oral mucosa in occupational studies. The molecular mechanisms leading to formation of MN (chromosomal breakage and aneuploidy) are well known. In total, 222 articles have been published since the method was developed in 1982. The majority of investigations were conducted with agricultural workers, followed by petrol station attendants, painters, pathology/anatomy lab workers, and miners. Positive results were reported in the majority of studies (86%); Brazil, Italy, Mexico, and Turkey being the most productive countries. The use of this technique increased substantially in recent years, and a recent correlation analysis with data from MN studies with lymphocytes indicates that the method is useful for predicting the cancer risks of chemically and radiation-exposed workers. The methodological quality of the studies increased in recent years since standardized and validated guidelines have been published. However, major shortcomings are still the lack of adequate matching (in particular in regard to nutrition and intake of dietary supplements), the lack of chemical exposure measurements, and the use of inadequate (DNA-nonspecific) stains. The most pronounced effects were seen in metal production workers, miners, petrol station attendants, agricultural workers, and pathologists. The sampling of cells from the oral cavity is noninvasive and requires no cultivation under sterile conditions is required. The currently available data indicate that this fast and easy-to-perform procedure provides valuable information about combined effects of chemical exposures and about the efficiency of safety measurements. Therefore, it should be used in the future for the routine surveillance of workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.