ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025
Factors influencing healthcare workers' vaccine recommendations: A cross-sectional study in Zhejiang Province, China.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vaccination practice and safety in children with special health care needs: A retrospective study of 1278 children.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Adherence to recommended immunization schedule during adolescence: findings of a cross-sectional study in the Southern part of Italy.BMC public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate factors influencing vaccine recommendations by healthcare workers (HCWs) in Zhejiang Province, China. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 569 HCWs to assess their beliefs and attitudes toward vaccines, vaccine recommendations and barriers to recommending vaccinations. Logistic regression was utilized to analyze influencing factors. Most participants (89.4%) believed that vaccines can effectively protect children's health. Higher professional titles (aOR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.03-1.50) and increased vaccine confidence (aOR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05-1.16) were positively associated with vaccine recommendation behaviors, while increased vaccine risk perception significantly reduced recommendations (aOR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.78-0.90). Moreover, vaccine hesitancy among HCWs was primarily driven by two main factors: safety concerns regarding immunization (60.8%) and cognitive biases related to vaccine necessity and efficacy (25.8%). This study elucidates professional title advancement and vaccine confidence as critical determinants of vaccine recommendation behaviors among HCWs in Zhejiang Province, China. To improve vaccine acceptance and achieve higher immunization coverage, targeted vaccine education and confidence-building programs should be integrated into HCWs' professional training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.