Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40820807›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of immunology2025

Human T Cell Responses to Flavivirus Vaccines.

David Wullimann, Hans-Gustaf Ljunggren

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Human T Cell Responses to Flavivirus Vaccines.European journal of immunology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David WullimannCenter For Infectious Medicine, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hans-Gustaf LjunggrenCenter For Infectious Medicine, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flaviviruses are major human pathogens that continue to pose a global health threat, and vaccination is an effective strategy to protect against disease from several flaviviruses. Flavivirus vaccines are believed to confer protection primarily through antibody responses; however, the role of T cells in vaccine immunity remains less explored despite demonstrated contribution in the response to natural infection. This review examines T cell responses induced by licensed or developing flavivirus vaccines, their contribution to protection, and key findings highlighting the importance of cellular immunity. We discuss the role of memory T cells, including CD4+ and CD8+ subsets, in flavivirus vaccine-induced immunity and compare the immunogenicity of live attenuated versus inactivated vaccines. We also discuss the significance of T cell immunity, cross-reactivity, and vaccine platform design in shaping durable and broad protection. Additionally, we broaden the discussion toward other human RNA viruses, including the influenza virus and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). A better understanding of the role of T cell immunity will be essential for optimizing the use of current flavivirus vaccines and developing next-generation approaches capable of providing long-lasting immunity against emerging and re-emerging flavivirus threats.

Indexed as

FlavivirusFlavivirus InfectionsT-LymphocytesViral VaccinesAnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCOVID-19Cross ReactionsHumansImmunity, CellularImmunologic MemorySARS-CoV-2Vaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, AttenuatedViral VaccinesCD4+ T cellsCD8+ T cellsdengue virusflavivirusimmune memoryJapanese encephalitis virustick‐borne encephalitis virusvaccinationviral protectionyellow fever virusZika virus

Identifiers

PMID40820807
PMCPMC12358716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.