ArticleEuropean journal of oral sciences2025
Effect of MDP agents on the bond strength of two self-adhesive resin cements to saliva-contaminated dentin substrates.
Article in European journal of oral sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of adjunctive methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate primers on dentin bond strength of universal adhesives under saliva and artificial aging.European journal of oral sciences · 2026Article
- Effect of MDP agents on the bond strength of two self-adhesive resin cements to saliva-contaminated dentin substrates.European journal of oral sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the influence of 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) agents and repeated saliva contamination on the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of two self-adhesive resin cements (SARCs) bonded to dentin. Forty-eight sound human teeth were randomly divided into eight experimental groups, based on three factors: the type of SARC, the presence or absence of an MDP agent, and the presence or absence of multiple saliva exposures. The control group for each SARC received neither MDP agent nor multiple saliva contaminations. For each group, five teeth were sectioned to obtain 30-44 beams, followed by µTBS testing, fracture mode analysis, and scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed using one-way and two-way analysis of variance, Scheffé's test, and Weibull statistics. Under uncontaminated conditions, the application of MDP agents was found to significantly enhance the bond strength of both SARCs. Saliva contamination significantly reduced µTBS, regardless of the cement used. However, when MDP agents were applied prior to bonding, µTBS values remained comparable to those of uncontaminated controls, even after multiple saliva exposures. These results support the use of MDP agents to maintain adhesive integrity in the presence of repeated salivary contaminations, offering greater reliability in adverse clinical environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.