Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40820675›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC2025

Comparative Analysis of Benchtop NMR and HPLC-UV for Illicit Drug Mixtures.

Shallu Verma, Ben Bogun, James A Robinson, Daniel J Holland

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shallu VermaUniversity of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Ben BogunNew Zealand Institute for Public Health and Forensic Science, Auckland, New Zealand.
James A RobinsonUniversity of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Daniel J HollandUniversity of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-9192-5396

Funding

Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment UOCX2304PHF Science Expanding Research Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the feasibility of benchtop NMR spectroscopy for the quantitative analysis of methamphetamine hydrochloride in binary and ternary mixtures. A 60-MHz benchtop NMR spectrometer was used to analyse samples containing methamphetamine hydrochloride at purities ranging from approximately 10 to 90 mg per 100 mg of sample, alongside cutting agents (methylsulfonylmethane, N-isopropylbenzylamine hydrochloride, caffeine and phenethylamine hydrochloride) and an impurity (pseudoephedrine hydrochloride). Spectral data were processed using integration, global spectral deconvolution (GSD), quantitative GSD (qGSD), and a quantitative quantum mechanical model (QMM). The root mean square error (RMSE) for these methods ranged from 4.7-mg analyte per 100 mg of sample for integration down to 1.3-mg analyte per 100 mg of sample for QMM when determining methamphetamine hydrochloride purity across binary and ternary mixtures. To further assess performance, additional mixtures were analysed using benchtop NMR with QMM and HPLC-UV, yielding RMSE values of 2.1 and 1.1, respectively, for methamphetamine hydrochloride purity quantification across all samples. While HPLC-UV maintains greater precision, benchtop NMR with QMM offers a cost-effective and robust alternative, enabling simultaneous quantification of active substances and impurities with reduced reliance on solvents and calibration standards. This study underscores the potential of benchtop NMR as a complementary tool in forensic science and for implementing a quantitative technique in harm-reduction drug-checking centres.

Indexed as

Illicit DrugsMethamphetamineChromatography, High Pressure LiquidMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopySpectrophotometry, UltravioletIllicit DrugsMethamphetaminebenchtop NMRforensic chemistryHPLC‐UVmethamphetaminequantitative NMR spectroscopyquantum mechanical modelling

Identifiers

PMID40820675
PMCPMC12500361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.