ArticleMagnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC2025
Comparative Analysis of Benchtop NMR and HPLC-UV for Illicit Drug Mixtures.
Article in Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of Benchtop NMR and HPLC-UV for Illicit Drug Mixtures.Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluates the feasibility of benchtop NMR spectroscopy for the quantitative analysis of methamphetamine hydrochloride in binary and ternary mixtures. A 60-MHz benchtop NMR spectrometer was used to analyse samples containing methamphetamine hydrochloride at purities ranging from approximately 10 to 90 mg per 100 mg of sample, alongside cutting agents (methylsulfonylmethane, N-isopropylbenzylamine hydrochloride, caffeine and phenethylamine hydrochloride) and an impurity (pseudoephedrine hydrochloride). Spectral data were processed using integration, global spectral deconvolution (GSD), quantitative GSD (qGSD), and a quantitative quantum mechanical model (QMM). The root mean square error (RMSE) for these methods ranged from 4.7-mg analyte per 100 mg of sample for integration down to 1.3-mg analyte per 100 mg of sample for QMM when determining methamphetamine hydrochloride purity across binary and ternary mixtures. To further assess performance, additional mixtures were analysed using benchtop NMR with QMM and HPLC-UV, yielding RMSE values of 2.1 and 1.1, respectively, for methamphetamine hydrochloride purity quantification across all samples. While HPLC-UV maintains greater precision, benchtop NMR with QMM offers a cost-effective and robust alternative, enabling simultaneous quantification of active substances and impurities with reduced reliance on solvents and calibration standards. This study underscores the potential of benchtop NMR as a complementary tool in forensic science and for implementing a quantitative technique in harm-reduction drug-checking centres.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.