ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025
Exposure-Response Analysis of Repotrectinib to Support the Dose Recommendation for Patients With ROS1-Positive NSCLC or NTRK-Positive Solid Tumors.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To support the benefit-risk assessment and dose justification of repotrectinib for patients with c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or neurotrophin receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK)-positive solid tumors, exposure-response analyses were conducted. The analysis used data from the TRIDENT-1 trial for key clinical efficacy endpoints-objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS), as well as 5 clinical safety endpoints: Grade 2 or higher (Gr2+) dizziness, Gr2+ anemia, Grade 3 or higher (Gr3+) treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), Gr2+ neurologic AEs, and dose reduction or interruption due to AEs. The exposure-response relationship for ORR was characterized by logistic regression with average repotrectinib exposure over the first 56 days of dosing; PFS or safety endpoints were evaluated by Cox proportional-hazards models with time-varying cumulative half-daily average drug concentration. The model predicted efficacy and safety were compared for 160 mg QD/BID (160 mg QD for 14 days, followed by 160 mg BID) and 160 mg QD under different food statuses. The recommended dose of 160 mg QD/BID demonstrated improved ORR and PFS over 160 mg QD in both ROS1-positive NSCLC and NTRK-positive solid tumors, while the increase in AEs was minimal. Predicted efficacy and safety were comparable across food conditions, supporting the administration of 160 mg QD/BID regardless of food. This work highlighted the importance of selecting appropriate exposure measures in exposure-response analyses, particularly when dose or dose frequencies change throughout treatment. The integrated exposure-response analyses provided a robust framework to support the repotrectinib dosing strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.