Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40820560›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Experience, Process, and Impact of Involving Informal Caregivers of People With Dementia as Public Contributors to Inform the Development of a Complex Intervention: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Frida Svedin, Ida Österman Menander, Oscar Blomberg, Anders Brantnell, Paul Farrand, Theresia Lückner, Kristina Sundelin, Joan Turney, Anna Cristina Åberg, Joanne Woodford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Family Carer Involvement in Dementia Care Research: A Scoping Review and Expert Consultation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Navigating Long-Term Co-Creative Research With Young Adults Diagnosed With Cancer: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Frida SvedinCIRCLE-Complex Intervention Research in Health and Care, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8421-4908
Ida Österman MenanderCIRCLE-Complex Intervention Research in Health and Care, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Oscar BlombergCIRCLE-Complex Intervention Research in Health and Care, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7472-5130
Anders BrantnellCIRCLE-Complex Intervention Research in Health and Care, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6841-7644
Paul FarrandClinical Education, Development and Research (CEDAR); Psychology, University of Exeter, Devon, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7898-5362
Theresia LücknerINVOLVERA Public Advisory Group, CIRCLE-Complex Intervention Research in Health and Care, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Kristina SundelinINVOLVERA Public Advisory Group, CIRCLE-Complex Intervention Research in Health and Care, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Joan TurneyINVOLVERA Public Advisory Group, CIRCLE-Complex Intervention Research in Health and Care, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anna Cristina ÅbergCIRCLE-Complex Intervention Research in Health and Care, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8196-0553
Joanne WoodfordCIRCLE-Complex Intervention Research in Health and Care, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5062-6798

Funding

This study was funded by the Swedish Research Council, Familijen Kamprads stiftelse, the Geriatric Foundation, and via the Swedish Research Council to U-CARE, a strategic research environment. 2009-1093This study was funded by the Swedish Research Council, Familijen Kamprads stiftelse, the Geriatric Foundation, and via the Swedish Research Council to U-CARE, a strategic research environment. 2018-02691This study was funded by the Swedish Research Council, Familijen Kamprads stiftelse, the Geriatric Foundation, and via the Swedish Research Council to U-CARE, a strategic research environment. 2023-01893This study was funded by the Swedish Research Council, Familijen Kamprads stiftelse, the Geriatric Foundation, and via the Swedish Research Council to U-CARE, a strategic research environment. 20233075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPublic contribution is increasingly prioritised by research institutions, funding bodies, and policymakers globally. However, the evidence base for the impact of public contribution remains limited. Researchers and public contributors' experiences of such activities are also rarely reported. We worked alongside a Public Advisory Group (PAG) consisting of informal caregivers of people with dementia during a series of studies to inform the development and adaptation of a guided low-intensity behavioural activation intervention for people with dementia (INVOLVERA). The overall aim of the current study was to explore the experience, process, and impact of involving caregivers of people with dementia as public contributors during the intervention development phase of INVOLVERA.

methodsPublic contribution activities were recorded using impact logs from PAG meetings, from which public contributors' suggestions for the intervention were extracted and categorised, and the implementation rate calculated. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with public contributors (n = 4) and researchers (n = 3), and analysed using manifest content analysis.

resultsPublic contributors made 158 suggestions across nine PAG meetings, with 76% of these implemented by the researchers. Analysis of interviews generated three categories: Perceived impacts, Interactions and facilitators, and Future challenges and opportunities. Interviews suggested public contribution activities positively impacted the research (e.g., improving intervention acceptability) and those involved (e.g., new knowledge and skills). Public contributors provided valuable recommendations for involving people with dementia and male caregivers in future activities.

conclusionsFindings illustrate a positive impact of public contribution activities on the research and those involved. This underscores the important role of public contribution during the development of complex interventions and further emphasises the need for comprehensive reporting on the impact of such activities. We believe this study strengthens the evidence base for public contribution and offers practical insights into fostering effective partnerships with public contributors. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A PAG consisting of wives and daughters (n = 4) of people with dementia worked alongside the researchers throughout the intervention development phase of the project. Contributions included (1) sense-making and interpreting results from a series of intervention development studies, (2) co-designing the intervention, and (3) disseminating findings, including co-writing the current paper.

Indexed as

CaregiversCommunity ParticipationDementiaAdvisory CommitteesFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative Researchcodesigndementia researchevaluationintervention developmentpatient and public involvement

Identifiers

PMID40820560
PMCPMC12358738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.