ArticleBritish journal of haematology2025
Patient survey in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): Identifying unmet needs related to treatment and disease control in patients living in the United States.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient survey in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): Identifying unmet needs related to treatment and disease control in patients living in the United States.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
- Immune thrombocytopenia: Evolving mechanistic understanding and clinical development of new therapies.Tzu chi medical journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a chronic disease with primary therapeutic goals of platelet count recovery to safe levels to minimize active/future bleeding, alongside easing additional symptoms negatively impacting overall patient well-being with consequent improvement in physical fatigue/energy levels, daily/work-related activities and social/emotional health. Documentation of this rare disease is important for evaluating real-world experiences in treatment satisfaction, expectations and unmet needs in disease management. This cross-sectional, real-world evidence survey was conducted from 9 February 2023 to 4 April 2023, by the Platelet Disorder Support Association and Sanofi in US adults diagnosed with ITP for ≥1 year. Results showed that although most patients receive and adhere to treatment, lack of sustained efficacy fuels a need for more effective therapy. Patients desired long-term ITP control and were most concerned with increasing/stabilizing platelet counts and decreasing fatigue and bleeding severity. Better treatment was needed to ease burdensome health-related quality of life symptoms, especially physical fatigue and anxiety, and decrease effects on daily life and activities. Additionally, involvement in shared decision-making and engagement in educational, digital healthcare and psychological support were preferred. Overall, ITP patients desired long-term disease management options that improved platelet counts, minimized bleeding and reduced physical fatigue and anxiety, while also engaging in patient support options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.