Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40820555›Full record

ArticleJournal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology2026

A Scoping Review of Clinical Utility from the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Memory Index Score.

Oscar R Kronenberger, Alyssa N Kaser, Jeff Schaffert, Vishal J Thakkar, William Goette, Christian LoBue, Laura H Lacritz

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Oscar R KronenbergerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-4923-5892
Alyssa N KaserDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3224-1637
Jeff SchaffertDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8842-980X
Vishal J ThakkarDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
William GoetteDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2909-1068
Christian LoBueDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9671-5526
Laura H LacritzDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveThe Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Memory Index Score (MIS) is a supplemental assessment of memory composed of word list delayed free-recall followed by step-down category cued- and multiple-choice cued-recall. This paper reviews the MIS literature within Alzheimer's and other neurodegenerative dementias to synthesize evidence regarding its clinical utility, identify gaps, and inform future research directions.MethodWe searched electronic databases of OVID Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and PubMed from 2014, when the MIS was first described, to July 2025. Peer-reviewed studies that reported data on the diagnostic or prognostic utility of the MIS in assessing neurodegenerative dementia populations were included.ResultsWe screened 278 articles, and 14 were included in the review. The current literature includes limited reporting on the diagnostic or prognostic utility of the MIS and is characterized by minimal diversity of samples and non-rigorous validation methods. Initial findings are promising and suggestive of incremental validity over the MoCA total score for identifying episodic memory impairment and therefore aiding in differentiation of suspected dementia etiology. However, evidence is insubstantial for the MIS as a tool for predicting progression and additional research is needed to evaluate the incremental validity of the MIS over the conventional MoCA five-word recall score.ConclusionsLarge literature gaps exist regarding the clinical utility of the MIS within neurodegenerative dementias. Additional research exploring the psychometric properties of the MIS using diverse samples with rigorous validation methods is needed to better inform its application.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDementiaMental Status and Dementia TestsCognitive DysfunctionHumansAlzheimer’s diseasecognitive declinememory index scoremild cognitive impairmentmontreal cognitive assessmentneurodegenerative dementia

Identifiers

PMID40820555
PMCPMC13009243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.