In one paragraphObservational study in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
26 authors.
Masahiko MukainoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine I, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan. masahikovn@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4348-8715 Catarina Aguiar BrancoDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Centro Hospitalar de Entre o Douro e Vouga, Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal; Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5666-842X Alia AlghwiriDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0002-2122-9280 Sonia AmatoMultidisciplinary Department of Medical-Surgical and Dental Specialities, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Naples, Italy.
Antonios KontaxakisPhysical and Rehabilitation Medicine Department, 414 Military Hospital of Special Diseases, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7076-890X Hüma Bölük ŞenlikciUniversity of Ankara Medipol, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6771-3265 Pinar BormanUniversity of Ankara Medipol, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1212-6797 Salmane DiouaneFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah, Fez, Morocco.
Maryam FourtassiLife and Health Sciences Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Abdelmalek Essaâdi University, Tangier, Moroc.ORCID 0000-0003-4915-5399 Francesca GimiglianoDepartment of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1905-6405 Abderrazak HajjiouiFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah, Fez, Morocco; Life and Health Sciences Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Abdelmalek Essaâdi University, Tangier, Morocco.ORCID 0000-0002-2311-5543 Sinforian KambouInstitute of Applied Neurosciences and Functional Rehabilitation, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Cho-I LinDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch, Yunlin, Taiwan.
Mohamed I MabroukDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan.ORCID 0009-0009-9191-1240 Evanthia MitsiokapaPhysical and Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Sotiria General Hospital of Chest Diseases of Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0574-4047 Remus Iulian NicaCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Midwifery and Nursing, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-3722-6877 Christina-Anastasia RapidiPhysical and Rehabilitation Medicine Department, General Hospital "G.Gennimatas", Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-3340-1444 Gabriella SerlengaMultidisciplinary Department of Medical-Surgical and Dental Specialities, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Naples, Italy.
Arianna SilvestriMultidisciplinary Department of Medical-Surgical and Dental Specialities, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Naples, Italy.
Sinikka Tarvonen-SchröderNeurocenter, Turku University Hospital and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2314-7166 Arja ViinanenDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Turku University Hospital, Finland; Pulmonary Diseases and Clinical Allergology, University of Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4990-6228 Panagiotis VorniotakisBlocks Rehab, Rehabilitation Center, Athens, Greece.
Melissa SelbICF Research Branch, Nottwil, Switzerland; Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5882-6644 Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
objectiveto report on the development and global testing of the COVID-19 version of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-based Clinical Functioning Information Tool called "ClinFIT COVID-19" to collect functioning data of rehabilitation patients across the care continuum to establish an interval-scaled functioning score.
designMulticentre, cross-sectional observational study. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: Rehabilitation patients in acute, post-acute, and long-term settings.
methodsThree context-specific versions (13-16 ICF categories) of ClinFIT-COVID-19 were administered to collect information on patient functioning. Rasch analysis examined psychometric properties and generated conversion tables from ordinal raw scores to a 0-100 interval metric.
resultsTwenty-six study centres in 17 countries across the globe collected data from 1,747 patients. Problems in exercise tolerance functions were most frequently reported in the acute and post-acute settings (74.2%; 87.6%), while long-term care patients most frequently reported pain as problematic (71.1%). With a testlets approach and item splitting, all 3 ClinFIT COVID-19 versions satisfied Rasch model expectations (item-trait χ² p > 0.05; PSI 0.742-0.812), making it feasible to develop respective transformation tables.
conclusionThis study found the psychometric properties of ClinFIT COVID-19 acceptable. Future studies are needed to validate the use of the transformation tables to monitor functioning and evaluate intervention impact.
Indexed as
Continuity of Patient CareCOVID-19Disability EvaluationInternational Classification of Functioning, Disability and HealthAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsSARS-CoV-2
Identifiers
PMID40820498
PMCPMC12375903
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390