ReviewTechnology in cancer research & treatment
The Role of Whole-Body MRI in Patients with Lymphoma: A Narrative Review.
Review in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lymphomas, including Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), represent a significant proportion of malignancies affecting diverse age groups, including children and pregnant women. Traditional imaging modalities, such as 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) and contrast-enhanced CT, are standard for staging and monitoring but expose patients to ionizing radiation, increasing the risk of secondary malignancies. This review evaluates whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) as a radiation-free alternative for assessing lymphoproliferative disorders. We examine its strengths, including the ability to detect disease and assess treatment response, as well as its limitations, such as challenges in visualizing small thoracic lesions. Recent studies demonstrate high concordance between WB-MRI and 18F-FDG-PET/CT, particularly for lymphomas with low or variable FDG avidity, making WB-MRI a promising modality for staging and follow-up, especially in young and pregnant patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.