ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2025
Optimal Stimulation Sites and Connectomes for GPi and STN-DBS in Cervical Dystonia.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimal Stimulation Sites and Connectomes for GPi and STN-DBS in Cervical Dystonia.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo map optimal stimulation targets (sweet spots) and neural networks for globus pallidus internus (GPi)- and subthalamic nucleus (STN)-deep brain stimulation (DBS) in cervical dystonia (CD), and compare their structural/functional connectivity profiles and predictive validity for clinical outcomes.
methodsRetrospective analysis of 76 stimulation settings from 38 CD patients across four centers. Volume of tissue activated was reconstructed; connectivity-based sweet spots were identified. Structural/functional connectivity models were developed using normative connectomes and validated externally. Clinical outcomes were assessed using validated scales.
resultsOptimal targets localized to the posterior ventral medial GPi and dorsolateral STN. The ideal probabilistic stimulation maps of STN-DBS exhibited predictive clinical improvement. Both targets showed beneficial connections to the motor cortex, with GPi-DBS negatively connected to the occipital lobe and STN-DBS positively connected to the premotor cortex and cerebellum. Functional connectivity patterns further highlighted shared and distinct regions linked to CD symptoms. Moreover, the structural and functional connectivity models predicted postoperative improvement through internal and external validation.
conclusionGPi- and STN-DBS engage distinct but overlapping networks in CD. Connectivity-based models robustly predict clinical improvement, offering tools for personalized targeting and programming. These findings clarify network mechanisms of DBS in dystonia and advance precision neuromodulation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.