Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40820296›Full record

ArticleNutrition and health2026

Enhancing nutrition education resources through the development and refinement of a checklist using the suitability assessment of materials (SAM).

Oliver Sage, Flora Wang, Chiara DiAngelo, Sandra Marsden, Claudia Faustini, Shannan Grant, Tamara R Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Oliver SageFaculty of Land and Food Systems, Food Nutrition and Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Flora WangCanadian Sugar Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1825-3589
Chiara DiAngeloCanadian Sugar Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sandra MarsdenCanadian Sugar Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Claudia FaustiniDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Concordia University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Shannan GrantDepartment of Applied Human Nutrition, Faculty of Professional Studies, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4925-4653
Tamara R CohenFaculty of Land and Food Systems, Food Nutrition and Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9773-9965

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundEvidence-based nutrition education resources are one way to help registered dietitians (RDs) translate scientific knowledge to consumers.AimTo develop a checklist based on suitability assessment of materials (SAM) and to assess its use to refine nutrition education resources.MethodsRDs were recruited online to assess two nutrition education resources using SAM. Three rounds of surveying and two rounds of resource refinements occurred. A "checklist" was created to refine the resources between rounds. Descriptive statistics and nonparametric tests were performed to explore differences in SAM-scores between rounds.ResultsRDs participated in the first (

Indexed as

ChecklistHealth EducationNutritional SciencesHumansNutritionistsSurveys and Questionnairesnutrition educationregistered dietitianresourcesSuitabilitytools

Identifiers

PMID40820296
PMCPMC12982570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.