ArticleBMC health services research2025
Utilising clinical associates to address mental health service provision challenges in South Africa: the views of healthcare managers and providers.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA constraint in South Africa's mental health system is the human resources required to provide services. Given the shortage of specialist mental health professionals, the use of non-specialists such as clinical associates in mental health task-sharing is essential. The study aimed to explore the views of health managers, doctors, and nurses in four districts of South Africa on the scale of mental illness seen in their health services, their human resources challenges, and their attitudes towards mental health task-sharing involving clinical associates.
methodsFocus group discussions were conducted in one district in each of the four provinces where clinical associates were known to be employed. Focus group participants were purposively sampled to ensure that each focus group consisted of a combination of managers and healthcare professionals from hospital and primary health care levels. Audio recordings were transcribed, and thematic analysis was conducted.
resultsA total of 29 individuals participated. Four themes emerged from the focus group discussions. The first theme to emerge was 'mental illness is not going away' with substance use, increasing numbers of younger patients, and high rates of relapse and readmission accounting for this. The second theme identified was 'the health system cannot cope with mental illness' as mental health had not been prioritised and this had resulted in a lack of mental health units and beds, deficiencies at primary health care level, and human resources for mental health challenges. The third theme was 'clinical associates could be part of the remedy' based on past experience in other disciplines but constraints such as their scope of practice would need to be addressed. The final theme identified was 'specialised clinical associates could help mend the mental health system' but this would require a review of employment policies and a clarification of their roles.
conclusionsMental health is a significant and expanding concern. Clinical associates could help alleviate human resource constraints in mental health with enhanced undergraduate and advanced training. However, overcoming structural barriers such as scope of practice, regulatory issues, and creation of posts will be crucial to realise their potential contribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.