Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40820216›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Nanoparticle-driven growth enhances mechanical properties of flax stems.

Wencai Li, Xhulja Biraku, Erik Nielsen, Alan Taub, Mihaela Banu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wencai LiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Xhulja BirakuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Erik NielsenDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Alan TaubDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Mihaela BanuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. mbanu@umich.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While nanoparticle uptake by plants has primarily been studied for environmental remediation, its purposeful use to enhance plant structural and mechanical properties remains unexplored. We hypothesized that cellulose nanofibers (CNFs), introduced into the growth medium, could be absorbed by flax stems, reinforcing their cell walls formation and, as a consequence, improve the mechanical performance. Thus, in this paper it is proved that flax plants treated with a 0.2% w/v CNF solution after root excision showed increased stem diameter, reduced pith size, and significantly accelerated root regeneration (~ 7 cm in 20 days) compared to controls treated with autoclaved deionized water. Analyses of the CNF-treated stems showed an increase in the mechanical performance of the stems revealing up to 50% increase in energy to fracture, 22% increase in Young's modulus, and approximate 33% improvement in stiffness at a reduced density compared to the non-treated stems. To explain these effects, morphology analysis of stems was conducted. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) revealed enhanced hydrogen bonding, cellulose crystallinity, and thermal stability. This study developed a novel in vivo approach by incorporating CNFs into plants during early growth to trigger structural reinforcement, which in turn improves mechanical performance.

Indexed as

FlaxNanoparticlesPlant StemsCalorimetry, Differential ScanningCelluloseElastic ModulusNanofibersPlant RootsSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredCellulose

Identifiers

PMID40820216
PMCPMC12358588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.