Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40820205›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Elucidation of user autonomous driving system preference mechanisms under the extension of internal and external factors.

Juncheng Mu, Linglin Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Juncheng MuSchool of Fine Arts, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210023, China. 211601009@njnu.edu.cn.
Linglin ZhouSchool of Fine Arts, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210023, China. 211601010@njnu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study is based on the extended Technology Acceptance Model, integrating Habit Theory and Regret Theory to construct a model of users' continuous usage intentions. It conducts a comparative analysis of users' continuous usage intentions for both assisted driving systems and driverless systems. Data was collected through an online questionnaire survey and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling. The results indicate that, within assisted driving systems, perceived importance and driving habits significantly influence continuous usage intentions; conversely, in driverless systems, driving habits are paramount. In both systems, users' perceived importance and experience of regret have a significant impact on driving habits, with experience of regret indirectly affecting continuous usage intentions through driving habits. User scale exerts direct or indirect effects through various variables. Regarding control variables, significant differences exist between the two systems; users of assisted driving systems prioritize economic benefits, while users of driverless systems focus on after-sales service. This research theoretically establishes a new framework, enriching and refining relevant theories; practically, it provides references for system improvement and promotion; and it suggests avenues for future research into control variables and segmented user groups. The study reveals the driving factors behind users' continuous usage of different driving systems, constructing a universally applicable theoretical model with significant academic and practical implications.

Indexed as

Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS)Behavior intentionComparative studyDriverless systemsSustained usage intention

Identifiers

PMID40820205
PMCPMC12358633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.