Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40820200›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Determinants of indiscriminate antimicrobial use in commercial chicken farms in Bangladesh and their impact on food safety and public health.

Md Mehedi Hasan, Tiasha Ali, A K M Dawlat Khan, Monjurul Islam, Md Arif Khan, Md Abu Sayeed, Md Zulqarnine Ibne Noman, Abdullah Al Mamun, Shariful Islam, Mohammad Mahmudul Hassasn and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Md Mehedi HasanInstitute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research (IEDCR), Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Tiasha AliInstitute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research (IEDCR), Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
A K M Dawlat KhanInstitute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research (IEDCR), Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Monjurul IslamInstitute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research (IEDCR), Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Md Arif KhanInstitute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research (IEDCR), Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Md Abu SayeedNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health (NCEPH), Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Md Zulqarnine Ibne NomanInstitute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research (IEDCR), Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Abdullah Al MamunInstitute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research (IEDCR), Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Shariful IslamInstitute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research (IEDCR), Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Mahmudul HassasnFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chattogram, 4225, Bangladesh.
Cameron E F ClarkGulbali Institute, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, 2678, Australia.
Tahmina ShirinInstitute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research (IEDCR), Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Ariful IslamGulbali Institute, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, 2678, Australia. aislam@csu.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), associated with irrational antimicrobial use (AMU) poses a significant health threat to both humans and animals. Thus, our research determined AMU patterns and their associated factors in Bangladeshi chicken farms. We conducted a cross-sectional study in 340 commercial chicken farms comprising broilers (109), layers (109), and Sonali (122) farms in seven districts of Bangladesh from September to October 2021. Data were collected using in-person interviews with a pre-tested semi-structured questionnaire. Statistical analyses were performed, including descriptive statistics to understand farmer demographics and AMU practices, a Chi-square test to evaluate farmers' knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP), and logistic regression analysis to determine the factors associated with AMU. The findings indicated that 93.2% (317/340) farms administered at least one antimicrobial (AM) to chickens during the production cycle, with 67.0% of farmers used antimicrobials (AMs) in the 14 days before data collection. The usage of AMs was higher in meat-type chickens, such as broiler (78.0%) and Sonali (67.2%), in contrast to egg-type chickens, like layer (41.3%). The AMU practices were significantly associated with multiple factors, such as farming experience, poultry production type, knowledge gaps in proper AMU practices, the person managing the farm, reuse of left-over AMs, and compliance with veterinarians' recommendations. We highlight the indiscriminate use of AMs that is occurring in poultry industry in Bangladesh, which could result in AM residues and resistance, posing detrimental consequences for public health. Farmers training on increasing their KAP regarding AMU to protect animal health, human health, and the ecosystem, is urgently needed.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnti-Infective AgentsChickensFood SafetyPublic HealthAdultAnimalsBangladeshCross-Sectional StudiesFarmersFarmsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Infective AgentsAMRAMUAntimicrobial misuseAntimicrobial residuesKAPPoultry

Identifiers

PMID40820200
PMCPMC12358552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.