Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40820191›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Physical function evaluation in volleyball training based on intelligent GRNN.

Kaiyuan Dong, Borhannudin Bin Abdullah, Hazizi Bin Abu Saad, Chenxi Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kaiyuan DongDepartment of Sports Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.
Borhannudin Bin AbdullahDepartment of Sports Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43400, Selangor, Malaysia. borhannudin@upm.edu.my.
Hazizi Bin Abu SaadDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.
Chenxi LuDepartment of Sports Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to improve both the evaluation accuracy and the real-time feedback capability in monitoring athletes' physical function changes during volleyball training. Firstly, based on the framework of the generalized regression neural network, a variable-structure generalized regression neural network (VSGRNN) is proposed and developed. Three heterogeneous kernel functions, namely Gaussian kernel, radial basis kernel, and Matern kernel, are introduced, and a local weighted response mechanism is constructed to enhance the expression ability of nonlinear physiological signals. Second, a dynamic adjustment mechanism for smoothing factors based on local gradient perturbation is proposed, enabling the model to have response compression capability in high-fluctuation samples. Finally, combining the structure embedding mapping mechanism with a multi-scale linear compression framework, the reconstruction of high-dimensional physiological indicators and the elimination of redundant features are achieved, improving model deployment efficiency. Comparative experiments conducted on training data of a high-level university men's volleyball team show that VSGRNN has a goodness-of-fit R

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerVolleyballAlgorithmsAthletesAthletic PerformanceHumansMaleYoung AdultGeneralized regression neural networkMulti- kernel adaptive modelingPhysical function assessmentVolleyball training

Identifiers

PMID40820191
PMCPMC12358535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.